This article first briefly discusses the problem of delayed memories a
nd long-term effects of child sexual abuse and the current trend to br
ing civil lawsuits or criminal prosecutions for childhood sexual abuse
. The article addresses the primary obstacle to such actions-the statu
te of limitations-which in most states places a time limit on when leg
al actions can be commenced. It describes the purpose of the statute o
f limitations and the need for changing or extending it in child sexua
l abuse cases; it then summarizes and analyzes the methods used by sta
te legislation and judicial decisions to change or extend the statute
of limitations in both criminal and civil actions. The article examine
s the pros and cons of bringing legal actions for child sexual abuse m
any years later, and concludes with a discussion regarding the current
debate about the accuracy and authenticity of long-term memory and th
e advisability of legal reforms to extend or eliminate the statute of
limitations in this area.