Samuel Cooper summarizes the two leading theories of separation of pow
ers: formalism and functionalism. Finding neither of these theories pe
rsuasive, he proposes a ''power analysis'' framework. Power analysis s
eeks to define the nature of legislative and executive power, and then
uses those definitions to analyze separation of powers conflicts. Thi
s approach views legislative power as encompassing all policymaking, a
nd executive power as ministerial. Mr. Cooper argues that tracking the
nature and use of legislative and executive powers provides a better
framework for resolving separation of powers conflicts.