T. Hatschek et al., CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT PREDNIMUSTINE TREATMENT OF NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA, Medical oncology and tumor pharmacotherapy, 10(4), 1993, pp. 159-166
Seventy-eight patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were rand
omized for treatment with prednimustine (Sterecyt) in two different sc
hedules: either receiving continuous treatment at a dosage of 60 mg da
ily, or intermittent two-week courses with 200 mg daily for five days.
The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and side effects of the
two different schedules. Forty patients received continuous, and 38 pa
tients intermittent treatment. Objective response was achieved in 66%
of 71 evaluable patients, equally distributed between the two treatmen
t arms. The 10-year survival rate was 20% (SE = 6%; continuous treatme
nt) and 11% (SE = 5%; intermittent treatment), respectively (logrank p
= 0.26). Median time to response, duration of response and time to pr
ogression showed no significant difference between the treatment group
s. Median time on treatment was longer for patients treated continuous
ly, probably due to more easily performed dose adjustments in such pat
ients. There was a significant decrease of the white blood cell counts
in patients who received prednimustine continuously compared with tho
se treated according to the intermittent schedule (p = 0.02). No signi
ficant differences were found regarding the thrombocyte levels. The re
sponse rate was closely related to haematological toxicity (p = 0.01).
Our results suggest that prednimustine in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas has
similar effectiveness both in daily treatment and in a two-weekly int
ermittent schedule. Continuously given treatment may be easier to gove
rn and, thereby, allow for higher treatment intensity. With respect to
toxicity, daily doses of approximately 30-40 mg in previously untreat
ed patients may be recommended.