COMPARISON OF THE USE OF STANDARD HEPARIN AND PROSTACYCLIN ANTICOAGULATION IN SPONTANEOUS AND PUMP-DRIVEN EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUITS IN PATIENTS WITH COMBINED ACUTE RENAL AND HEPATIC-FAILURE
A. Davenport et al., COMPARISON OF THE USE OF STANDARD HEPARIN AND PROSTACYCLIN ANTICOAGULATION IN SPONTANEOUS AND PUMP-DRIVEN EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUITS IN PATIENTS WITH COMBINED ACUTE RENAL AND HEPATIC-FAILURE, Nephron, 66(4), 1994, pp. 431-437
Although prostacyclin has been reported to be an effective extracorpor
eal anticoagulant for intermittent haemofiltration and dialysis treatm
ents, it has been suggested that it is inferior to heparin in preventi
ng clotting in spontaneously driven continuous haemofiltration and/or
dialysis circuits. We studied the effectiveness of both heparin and pr
ostacyclin as anticoagulants in a variety of extracorporeal circuits i
n 17 patients with combined acute hepatic and renal failure who were a
t risk of haemorrhage. Although there were no differences in the pump-
assisted extracorporeal circuits, prostacyclin was found superior to h
eparin during spontaneously driven continuous arteriovenous haemofiltr
ation and/or dialysis. During some 2,600 h of prostacyclin therapy, th
ere were only 3 episodes of haemorrhage that required blood transfusio
n compared to 8 major haemorrhages and 2 deaths from intracerebral hae
morrhage during 600 h of anticoagulation with heparin. The median filt
er life was greater with prostacyclin, 60 h (42-72), compared to hepar
in, 8 h (4-16), p < 0.01. This study suggests that prostacyclin is sup
erior to heparin in maintaining the integrity of a spontaneous arterio
venous extracorporeal circuit in patients at risk of major haemorrhage
.