We evaluate the optimizing ability (rate of adaptation) of trees on si
mple adaptive landscapes. At points away from a peak, there is a stron
g negative relationship between rate of adaptation and tree precision
P, a relationship that is independent of the size of the tree. P measu
res the variability among trial solutions generated by the tree: high
precision trees have low variability, low precision trees have high va
riability. Near a peak. the situation reverses, with high precision tr
ees showing higher rates of adaptation than low precision trees, howev
er, for all trees, the absolute rate of adaptation is uniformly low. O
n multiple-peak landscapes, the probability of crossing an adaptive va
lley from a lower peak to a higher peak is also negatively correlated
with tree precision. These results suggest that under a wide range of
conditions, trees with low precision are, on average, the best optimiz
ers.