COMPARATIVE CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY OF NASAL CAVITY GROWTH-PATTERNS IN 7 ANIMAL-MODELS

Citation
A. Losken et al., COMPARATIVE CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY OF NASAL CAVITY GROWTH-PATTERNS IN 7 ANIMAL-MODELS, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 31(1), 1994, pp. 17-23
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
10556656
Volume
31
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
17 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-6656(1994)31:1<17:CCSONC>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Although primates have been the craniofacial growth models of choice, recent circumstances have stimulated the search for nonprimate models. In a series of studies we have described changes in various regions o f the craniofacial complex for seven commonly used animal models. The present study examined the bony nasal cavity. One hundred and forty-fo ur serial and cross-sectional lateral head x-rays were obtained for un operated controls from previous growth studies. The sample consisted o f data from 26 rats, 21 rabbits, 21 domestic cats, 23 domestic dogs, 1 7 baboons, 16 rhesus monkeys, and 20 chimpanzees. Comparative human da ta was taken from the Bolton Standards. The samples were divided into three age categories based on dental and somatic development. Midsagit tal nasal cavity measurements included length, height, shape index, an d area. Analysis was based on the percent increase in measures from th e infant condition. Three major shapes were discerned at adulthood (1) vertical quadrangles (humans and cats); (2) triangles (chimpanzees, r hesus monkeys, and baboons), and (3) horizontal quadrangles (rabbits, rats, and dogs). Results showed that overall shape was best modeled by the chimpanzee and, as a nonprimate model, the laboratory cat. Rabbit s and rats also showed similar percent changes for length or height di mensions at different ages, suggesting that these animals may be accep table, inexpensive alternatives to primates in some experimental situa tions.