A. Gonzalezruiz et al., VALUE OF MICROSCOPY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF DYSENTERY ASSOCIATED WITH INVASIVE ENTAMOEBA-HISTOLYTICA, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 47(3), 1994, pp. 236-239
Aims-To assess the reliability of the detection of erythrophagocytic a
moebic trophozoites in stool samples in the diagnosis of dysentery ass
ociated with invasive Entamoeba histolytica. Methods-Amoebic culture w
as carried out on single stool samples collected from patients from Me
xico, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The stools had been examined by light
microscopy. Amoebic dysentery was diagnosed when erythrophagocytic E h
istolytica trophozoites were observed in a case of bloody diarrhoea. E
histolytica isolates were characterised by isoenzyme electrophoresis
and results correlated with microscopical findings in stools. Statisti
cal analysis was performed using the chi(2) test. Results-Where erythr
ophagocytic amoebae had been observed in dysenteric stool specimens th
e E histolytica phenotype was invariably invasive (p < 0.0001). Observ
ation of erythrophagocytic amoebae in dysentery is 100% specific and p
redictive of infection with invasive E histolytica. When amoebic cultu
re-positive cases only are considered it is 96% sensitive. In this stu
dy E histolytica of zymodeme XIV was more commonly associated with amo
ebic dysentery than zymodeme II. There was no significant difference b
etween the carriage rate of invasive and non-invasive E histolytica in
non-dysenteric diarrhoea. Asymptomatic subjects carried non-invasive
E histolytica more frequently than invasive E histolytica. Patients wi
th non-amoebic dysentery, when shown to be infected with E histolytica
, carried non-invasive strains (12%). Conclusions-Sensitivity and spec
ificity of microscopical examination of a single stool specimen for di
agnosing amoebic dysentery is very high; intestinal carriage of invasi
ve E histolytica detected by culture is not necessarily an indication
of active disease as patients with diarrhoea and asymptomatic subjects
shed invasive and non-invasive E histolytica. There are possibly two
subpopulations of invasive E histolytica with different pathogenic pot
ential which can be differentiated by zymodeme analysis.