I examine games involving private contributions to a public good and s
how that less of the public good will be supplied if agents move seque
ntially than if they move simultaneously. If the agents bid for the ri
ght to move first, the agent who values the public good least will win
. If each agent chooses the rate at which he will subsidize the other
agent's contributions, the subsidies that support the Lindahl allocati
on are the unique equilibrium outcome. I also describe two related sub
sidy-setting games that yield Lindahl allocations in n-person games wi
th general utility functions.