FALLOPOSCOPIC COMPARISON OF UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL PROXIMAL TUBAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE

Citation
Iw. Scudamore et al., FALLOPOSCOPIC COMPARISON OF UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL PROXIMAL TUBAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE, Human reproduction, 9(2), 1994, pp. 340-342
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02681161
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
340 - 342
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(1994)9:2<340:FCOUAB>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the appearance of the entire length of the oviductal canal in women with unilateral versus bilatera l proximal tubal occlusion. Eleven women had apparent unilateral disea se and 18 had apparent bilateral occlusion. Proximal occlusion was con firmed both by hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy. Falloposcopic ex amination was performed by retrograde visualization using the linear e version catheter, in office. Bilateral apparent proximal occlusion was found to have a significantly higher incidence of actual proximal occ lusion and distal intralumenal abnormalities. However, five proximal s egments and six distal segments were found to be abnormal where the pr e-examination diagnosis was unilateral occlusion. Furthermore, the con tralateral oviductal canal was found to be abnormal in four women with apparent unilateral disease, indicating that apparent unilateral prox imal tubal occlusion is associated with actual pathology. These data d emonstrate the value of intralumenal assessment of apparent proximal o cclusion.