J. Escourrou et al., ND-YAG LASER IN TREATMENT OF RECTAL-CANCER - ARE THERE FEATURES PREDICTING A CURATIVE RESULT, Digestive diseases and sciences, 39(3), 1994, pp. 464-472
In the present study we report the results of Nd:YAG laser treatment i
n 36 patients with rectal carcinoma in whom negative biopsies were obt
ained at the end of the treatment. The laser (100-W maximal power outp
ut) was applied through a flexible endoscope during 20- to 40-min sess
ions repeated every three days until the lesion was destroyed complete
ly. Follow-up examinations, including endoscopy with biopsies, liver a
nd endorectal ultrasonography and chest x-ray were performed every thr
ee months during the first year and thereafter once a year. Between 19
80 and 1991, 272 patients were treated. All were unfit for surgery bec
ause of metastasis (78), recurrence after an other procedure (54), ass
ociated conditions, or old age (140). No circumferential tumors of any
size were obliterated, but among the 139 patients presenting with a n
oncircumferential lesion less than 7 cm in diameter, negative biopsies
were obtained after laser treatment in 36 patients (26%). Of these 36
patients, eight had been treated previously by surgery (5) or radioth
erapy (3). Mean follow-up is 37 months (range 12-71). Recurrences were
observed in four cases. Seven patients died during the study but only
one death was related to the cancer (pelvic extension 19 months after
treatment). Endorectal ultrasonography was performed prior to treatme
nt in 15 patients and showed no invasion of the rectal wall deeper tha
n the submucosa. After treatment, endorectal ultrasonography in 22 pat
ients showed significant changes corresponding to cicatricial pattern
in 60% of controlled patients. These changes disappeared by three mont
hs except in three patients in each of whom a echo-guided biopsy ruled
out a local recurrence. No complication of laser therapy was observed
in these 36 patients. Laser treatment is effective for noncircumferen
tial carcinomas smaller than 7 cm in diameter and not deeply invading
the rectal wall. Such therapy, however, seems most appropriate for pat
ients who are unfit for surgery.