THE CCK(A) RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST DEVAZEPIDE DOES NOT MODIFY OPIOID SELF-ADMINISTRATION OR DRUG DISCRIMINATION - COMPARISON WITH THE DOPAMINE ANTAGONIST HALOPERIDOL

Citation
Ga. Higgins et al., THE CCK(A) RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST DEVAZEPIDE DOES NOT MODIFY OPIOID SELF-ADMINISTRATION OR DRUG DISCRIMINATION - COMPARISON WITH THE DOPAMINE ANTAGONIST HALOPERIDOL, Brain research, 640(1-2), 1994, pp. 246-254
Citations number
75
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00068993
Volume
640
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
246 - 254
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8993(1994)640:1-2<246:TCRADD>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We previously reported that the selective cholecystokinin(A) (CCK(A)) receptor antagonist, devazepide, blocked the acquisition of a morphine conditioned place preference (ref 28). An interpretation of this find ing is that devazepide may either affect an opioid discriminative stim ulus and/or modify the rewarding properties of opioids. The present st udy was designed to investigate these issues by determining the effect of equivalent doses of devazepide in a morphine drug discrimination p aradigm and a model of heroin self-administration. In each case, devaz epide (0.001-1 mg/kg) was ineffective, i.e there was no antagonism of a morphine discriminative cue, and in a separate group of rats trained to self-administer heroin (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, FR5 schedule, 1h per day), devazepide did not alter the pattern of heroin responding. Becau se of evidence implicating an interaction between accumbens CCK and do pamine (DA) systems and evidence suggesting an apparent differential i nvolvement of DA in opioid place conditioning, self-administration and drug discrimination behaviour, the effect of the DA antagonist halope ridol was examined in the latter two paradigms. In each test, haloperi dol produced an effect inconsistent with a direct DAergic involvement. In a final study the CCK(B) antagonist L365-260 was also found not to affect an opioid discriminative cue. The present results therefore ca st doubt on the potential utility of selective CCK(A) antagonists as t reatments for opioid abuse, and further suggest that CCK(B) antagonist s may not potentiate the subjective effects of opioids, an important f inding considering that such drugs have been proposed as adjuncts to o pioid therapy for the treatment of pain relief.