The skill of a set of extended-range dynamical forecasts made with a m
odem numerical forecast model is examined. A forecast is said to be sk
illful if it produces a high quality forecast by correctly modeling so
me aspects of the dynamics of the real atmosphere; high quality foreca
sts may also occur by chance. The dangers of making a conclusion about
model skill by verifying a single long-range forecast are pointed out
by examples of apparently high ''skill'' verifications between extend
ed-range forecasts and observed fields from entirely different years.
To avoid these problems, the entire distribution of forecast quality f
or a large set of forecasts as a function of lead time is examined. A
set of control forecasts that clearly have no skill is presented. The
quality distribution for the extended-range forecasts is compared to t
he distributions of quality for the no-skill control forecast set. The
extended-range forecast quality distributions are found to be essenti
ally indistinguishable from those for the no-skill control at leads so
mewhat greater than 12 days. A search for individual forecasts with a
''return of skill'' at extended ranges is also made. Although it is po
ssible to find individual forecasts that have a return of quality, a c
omparison to the no-skill controls demonstrates that these return of s
kill forecasts occur only as often as is expected by chance.