Em. Aro et al., RECOVERY FROM PHOTOINHIBITION IN PEAS (PISUM-SATIVUM L) ACCLIMATED TOVARYING GROWTH IRRADIANCES - ROLE OF D1 PROTEIN-TURNOVER, Plant physiology, 104(3), 1994, pp. 1033-1041
D1 protein turnover and restoration of the photochemical efficiency of
photosystem II (PSII) after photoinhibition of pea leaves (Pisum sati
vum L. cv Greenfeast) acclimated to different light intensities were i
nvestigated. All peas acclimated to different light intensities were a
ble to recover from photoinhibition,, at least partially, at light int
ensities far above their growth light irradiance. However, the capacit
y of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition under increasing-high
irradiances was strictly dependent on the light acclimation of the lea
ves; i.e. the higher the irradiance during growth, the better the capa
city of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition at moderate and hig
h light. In our experimental conditions, mainly D1 protein turnover-de
pendent recovery was monitored, since in the presence of an inhibitor
of chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis, lincomycin, only negligible
recovery took place. In darkness, neither the restoration of PSII phot
ochemical efficiency nor any notable degradation of damaged D1 protein
took place. In low light, however, good recovery of PSII occurred in
all peas acclimated to different light intensities and was accompanied
by fast degradation of the D1 protein. The rate of degradation of the
D1 protein was estimated to be 3 to 4 times faster in photoinhibited
leaves than in nonphotoinhibited leaves under the recovery conditions
of 50 mu mol of photons m(-2) s(-1). In moderate light of 400 mu mol o
f photons m(-2) s(-1), the photoinhibited low-light peas were not able
to increase further the rate of D1 protein degradation above that obs
erved in nonphotoinhibited leaves, nor was the restoration of PSII fun
ction possible. On the other hand, photoinhibited high-light leaves we
re able to increase the rate of D1 protein degradation above that of n
onphotoinhibited leaves even in moderate and high light, ensuring at l
east partial restoration of PSII function. We conclude that the capaci
ty of photoinhibited leaves to restore PSII function at different irra
diances was directly related to the capacity of the leaves to degrade
damaged D1 protein under the recovery conditions.