QUANTITATIVE EFFECT OF COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY AND FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY ON THE INCIDENCE OF RADIATION-INDUCED LUNG DAMAGE - A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-STUDY
K. Mah et al., QUANTITATIVE EFFECT OF COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY AND FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY ON THE INCIDENCE OF RADIATION-INDUCED LUNG DAMAGE - A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-STUDY, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 28(3), 1994, pp. 563-574
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: The objective of this work was to assess the incidence of rad
iological changes compatible with radiation-induced lung damage as det
ermined by computed tomography (CT), and subsequently calculate the do
se effect factors (DEF) for specified chemotherapeutic regimens. Metho
ds and Materials: A prospective, clinical study was conducted to deter
mine the response of normal lung tissue to combined chemotherapy and r
adiotherapy. Radiation treatments were administered once daily, 5 days
-per-week. Six clinical protocols were evaluated: ABVD (adriamycin, bl
eomycin, vincristine, and DTIC) followed by 35 Gy in 20 fractions; MOP
P (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) follow
ed by 35 Gy in 20; MOPP/ABVD followed by 35 Gy in 20; CAV (cyclophosph
amide, adriamycin, and vincristine) followed by 25 Gy in 10; and 5-FU
(5-fluorouracil) concurrent with either 50-52 Gy in 20-21 or 30-36 Gy
in 10-15 fractions. CT examinations were taken before and at predeterm
ined intervals following radiotherapy. CT evidence for the development
of radiation-induced damage was defined as an increase in lung densit
y within the irradiated volume. The radiation dose to lung was calcula
ted using a CT-based algorithm to account for tissue inhomogeneities.
Different fractionation schedules were converted using two isoeffect m
odels, the estimated single dose (ED) and the normalized total dose (N
TD). Results: A total of 102 patients were entered and 70 completed th
e study. Forty-two patients developed CT changes compatible with lung
damage. The actuarial incidence of radiological pneumonitis was 71% fo
r the ABVD, 49% for MOPP, 52% for MOPP/ABVD, 67% for CAV, 73% for 5-FU
radical, and 58% for 5-FU palliative protocols. Depending on the isoe
ffect model selected and the method of analysis, the DEF was 1.11-1.14
for the ABVD, 0.96-0.97 for the MOPP, 0.96-1.02 for the MOPP/ABVD, 1.
03-1.10 for the CAV, 0.74-0.79 for the 5-FU radical, and 0.94 for the
5-FU palliative protocols. Conclusion: Quantitative dose effect factor
s (DEF) were measured by comparing the incidences of CT-observed lung
damage in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy to those re
ceiving radiotherapy alone. The addition of ABVD or CAV appeared to re
duce the tolerance of lung to radiation.