The bronchodilating effect of terbutaline dry powder inhaled via Turbu
haler was compared with terbutaline inhaled via a conventional, chloro
fluorocarbon (CFC) inhaler and Nebuhaler (750 mi spacer) in 68 consecu
tive patients attending the emergency department with acute severe bro
nchial obstruction. The study was of an open, randomized, parallel gro
up design with one study day. Patients were treated with 2.5 mg of ter
butaline 15 min apart, either as dry powder via Turbuhaler or with a C
FC inhaler in conjunction with Nebuhaler. Data from 62 patients were a
nalyzed. The mean baseline FEV(1) values were 0.81 L (SD, 0.64; range,
0.14 to 2.74 L) in the Turbuhaler group (n = 33), and 0.90 L (SD, 0.9
0; range, 0.27 to 2.60 L) in the Nebuhaler group (n = 29). The mean in
creases in FEV(1) from baseline were 0.40 L (SD, 0.40; range, 0.06 to
2.36 L) and 0.21 L (SD, 0.25; range, - 0.05 to 0.95 L) 10 min after th
e last inhalation via Turbuhaler and Nebuhaler, respectively. The diff
erence between mean values of the increase in FEV(1) after terbutaline
treatment with Turbuhaler and the CFC inhaler and Nebuhaler was stati
stically significant (p = 0.0004, ANOVA). This study showed that inhal
ation of terbutaline via Turbuhaler produced a significantly greater i
ncrease in FEV(1) compared with the same dose of terbutaline administe
red via the CFC inhaler and Nebuhaler in patients attending the emerge
ncy department with acute severe bronchial obstruction.