A. Elmanira et F. Clarac, PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION IS MEDIATED BY HISTAMINE AND GABA IN THE CRUSTACEAN ESCAPE REACTION, Journal of neurophysiology, 71(3), 1994, pp. 1088-1095
1. Presynaptic inhibition of sensory transmission during the escape re
action in Crustacea has been studied using an in vitro preparation of
the crayfish thoracic ganglia. Electrical stimulation of the medial gi
ant fiber mediating the escape reaction induced depolarization in sens
ory afferent terminals of the coxo-basal chordotonal organ (CBCO). Thi
s depolarization was associated with an increase of the membrane condu
ctance and was partially blocked by a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) a
ntagonist, picrotoxin, and by a histamine antagonist, cimetidine. 2. P
ressure ejection of histamine on CBCO sensory terminals (CBT) recorded
intracellularly, induced a depolarization of the membrane potential a
ccompanied by a large increase of the conductance. Histamine-induced d
epolarization persisted after blockade of synaptic transmission mediat
ed by Na+ spikes by tetrodotoxin. The amplitude of histamine-induced d
epolarization increased when negative current was injected into the se
nsory terminal through the recording electrode. Moreover, injection of
chloride into the CBT, which shifts the reversal potential of chlorid
e to a more positive value, resulted in an increase of the amplitude o
f the histamine-induced depolarization. 3. The existence of separate r
eceptors for GABA and histamine on the CB sensory terminals was demons
trated using two complementary sets of experiments. The first one cons
isted of using specific blockers of GABA and histamine. Picrotoxin blo
cked selectively the GABA-induced depolarization of the CB sensory ter
minals, while it was ineffective in blocking the histamine-induced dep
olarization. Conversely, cimetidine blocked the histamine-induced depo
larization totally, but did not affect the GABA response. The second s
et of experiments tested for of cross-desensitization between GABA and
histamine responses. After desensitization of GABA response, histamin
e was still able to produce depolarization in the CBT. 4. The depolari
zation induced by medial giant fiber stimulation as well as by histami
ne was accompanied by a marked decrease of the amplitude of the affere
nt spikes recorded in the CB sensory terminals. This effect appeared,
at least partially, to be mediated by a shunting mechanism due to the
increased conductance during the depolarization. The effect of histami
ne on synaptic transmission was also investigated by recording monosyn
aptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) induced in postsynapt
ic motoneurons by electrical stimulation of the CB sensory nerve. Loca
l application of histamine over the sensory terminals induced a marked
decrease of the amplitude of the monosynaptic EPSPs. The effect of hi
stamine is, thus, mainly mediated by a presynaptic inhibition because
neither the membrane potential nor the input resistance of the motoneu
rons were affected when histamine was applied. 5. In conclusion, the e
scape reaction mediated by the medial giant fibers involves presynapti
c inhibition of the CB sensory afferents, which is mediated by a simul
taneous activation of both histamine and GABA receptors, in contrast t
o the locomotor-related presynaptic inhibition, which is mediated by G
ABA.