Three experiments investigated the cues used by musicians and nonmusic
ians asked to rate their confidence that an implied harmony change had
or had not occurred at a specified point in pseudo-randomly generated
, isochronous, triadic melodies that conformed to the rules of element
ary classical harmony. In the first experiment, a single melody note f
ollowed the putative point of harmony change, and subjects' responses
were predictable on the basis of whether this note was contained in th
e previous triad and the size of the melodic interval between this not
e and the one preceding it. Musicians were relatively more influenced
by the former factor, and nonmusicians, by the latter one. In the seco
nd experiment, five to seven melody notes followed the putative point
of harmony change, which greatly reduced control by the harmonic relat
ionship of the first of these to the previous triad, but the effect of
melodic interval size persisted. The third experiment verified the fi
ndings of the first two by using the cues that had been identified in
them as design variables and evaluating their effect with conventional
analytic statistics. This experiment also parametrically manipulated
the number of notes after the putative point of harmony change and sho
wed that maximum confidence concerning the occurrence of an implied ha
rmony change was reached with the first note that did not belong to th
e previous triad. Possible mechanisms for use of these cues to implied
harmony changes are discussed, and directions for future research are
indicated.