Jh. Storkholm et al., DIFFERENCES EXIST IN PASSIVE ELASTIC WALL PROPERTIES BETWEEN SEGMENTSOF ISOLATED GUINEA-PIG DISTAL ILEUM AND DUODENUM IN-VITRO, Neurogastroenterology and motility, 6(1), 1994, pp. 21-27
The aim was to study and to compare passive biomechanical wall propert
ies in the isolated duodenum and distal ileum of the guinea-pig. Stepw
ise inflation of an intraluminal balloon, in which the pressure and cr
oss-sectional area were measured simultaneously, provided the distensi
on stimulus. Biomechanical wall parameters such as wall tension and co
mpliance were calculated from steady state values of these measurement
s. Smooth muscle relaxation was obtained by adding 10(-3) M papaverine
to the organ bath. Cross-sectional area always reached equilibrium wi
thin the two-minute inflation period. The pressure-cross-sectional are
a relations showed a higher degree of hysteresis in the ileum than in
the duodenum (P < 0.01). Cross-sectional area and wall tension in dist
al ileum was higher than those in duodenum (P < 0.001). Compliance was
at pressures up to 3 kPa significantly higher in the ileum. At the hi
ghest induced pressures, compliance was the same for the two segments.
The model provides the opportunity for studying passive biomechanical
wall properties in the isolated small intestine. Biomechanical differ
ences were found between the proximal and distal small intestine. Thes
e properties may be related to the specialized functions of the two se
gments, e.g. flow properties.