THE REAL-TIME DUST EXPOSURES OF SODIUM-BORATE WORKERS - EXAMINATION OF EXPOSURE VARIABILITY

Citation
Sr. Woskie et al., THE REAL-TIME DUST EXPOSURES OF SODIUM-BORATE WORKERS - EXAMINATION OF EXPOSURE VARIABILITY, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 55(3), 1994, pp. 207-217
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00028894
Volume
55
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
207 - 217
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8894(1994)55:3<207:TRDEOS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
As part of an epidemiologic study of acute respiratory irritation, an assessment of the short term (TWA-0.25 hr) and daily (TWA-6 hr) dust a nd boron exposures of workers in a sodium borate production facility w as undertaken. A real-time continuous aerosol monitor was used in an a ctive mode with an in-line filter to collect a TWA-6 gravimetric sampl e with a datalogger to store the continuous aerosol measurements. Over 430 person-days of personal exposure measurements were made, resultin g in more than 10 000 15-minute average (TWA-0.25) dust concentration measurements. The arithmetic mean total dust concentrations for the 13 job groups exposed to sodium borate dust ranged from 0.29 to 18.95 mg /m3. The geometric standard deviation of the TWA-6 total dust exposure s within the sodium borate exposed job groups had a median of 2.78. Th e geometric standard deviation of the TWA-0.25 total dust exposures ha d a median of 3.97. In most jobs the ''within-day'' variability accoun ted for over 50% of the total variability in exposure levels. In jobs with constant exposure to sodium borate, the second most important sou rce of exposure variability was attributable to ''between worker'' dif ferences. Where there was only intermittent exposure, the second most important source of exposure variability was ''within-worker'' variabi lity. The implications of these findings for control strategies are di scussed. Based on boron measurements, a substantial portion of a total dust air sample is nonborate material such as cigarette smoke, vehicl e exhaust, ambient dust, or hydration mass. Thus, even in an environme nt where sodium borate is being packaged, total dust measurements are an overestimate of the actual borate exposure level.