Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the image quality, contrast charac
teristics, and possible clinical utility of STIR images obtained using
a fast SE (FSE) technique. Materials and Methods: The signal and cont
rast characteristics of FSE STIR images were evaluated using a lipid/w
ater phantom and normal volunteers. Based upon these results, optimal
FSE STIR imaging parameters were chosen. Conventional STIR and FSE STI
R images were then obtained (while maintaining an equal number of sect
ion locations between the two sequences) in a series of 14 patients wi
th known musculoskeletal abnormalities. These images were compared sid
e by side by two experienced MR radiologists for image quality and les
ion detection.Results: There were no statistically significant differe
nces between the FSE STIR images and conventional STIR images in lesio
n detection, image quality, motion artifact, or final diagnosis. Concl
usion: STIR imaging provides optimal contrast for detection of many pa
thologic abnormalities. This is especially true for musculoskeletal tu
mors and infection. The long imaging time and reduced number of sectio
ns obtainable with conventional SE (CSE) STIR sequences limit their ro
utine use. Our results show that FSE STIR images of the musculoskeleta
l system can be obtained up to seven times more rapidly than CSE STIR
images without compromising lesion detection or image quality.