To determine the influence of biological variation on the reliability
of data from different types of urine specimens, we measured nine anal
ytes in first-morning, randomly collected, and 24-h samples of urine f
rom 53 healthy individuals (14 men and 39 women). The urines were coll
ected once a week for 10 weeks. The data obtained were used as a basis
for specimen collection and to gain insight into the influence of uri
ne quantities in the diagnosis, screening, and monitoring of patients.
We found that 24-h urine expressed in output rather than concentratio
n units is the most reliable specimen for diagnosis and monitoring for
most of the analytes studied. On the basis of the ratio between estim
ated within- and between-subject variation, the tests with greatest me
dical usefulness for diagnosis and screening of specific pathologies a
re those measuring protein and sodium. Moreover, the results indicate
that urine creatinine may be a poor test for diagnosis, monitoring, an
d screening.