THE NONCOMPETITIVE NMDA ANTAGONIST MK-801 FAILS TO BLOCK AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED PLACE CONDITIONING IN RATS

Authors
Citation
Dc. Hoffman, THE NONCOMPETITIVE NMDA ANTAGONIST MK-801 FAILS TO BLOCK AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED PLACE CONDITIONING IN RATS, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 47(4), 1994, pp. 907-912
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
00913057
Volume
47
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
907 - 912
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-3057(1994)47:4<907:TNNAMF>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK- 801 prevents the development of sensitization to the locomotor-activat ing effects of amphetamine. In the present study, the possibility that the NMDA receptor might also play a role in the rewarding effects of amphetamine (as measured in the conditioned place preference paradigm) was investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg IP) paired with one side of a two-compartment box and saline pai red with the other side. During these pairings locomotor activity was measured. On the test day, the amount of time drug-free rats spent in each compartment was determined. Rats trained with amphetamine alone s howed a significant increase in time spent on the drug-paired side fro m pre- to postconditioning, indicating a place preference. When rats w ere injected with MK-801 (0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 mg/kg SC) prior to ampheta mine, no significant effects on amphetamine place conditioning were ob served. Rats treated with MK-801 alone showed significant place condit ioning, but only at the intermediate dose. On conditioning days, MK-80 1 produced a dose-dependent enhancement of amphetamine-induced locomot or activity; however, MK-801 alone caused a similar increase in activi ty. The preferential D-2 dopamine receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.0 1, 0.05, or 0.1 mg/kg SC) significantly reduced amphetamine locomotor activity, and the highest dose blocked place conditioning. These data suggest that the NMDA receptor is not involved in either the rewarding or locomotor-activating effects of amphetamine.