Rd. Stumpo et al., SOLID VERSUS LIQUID-PHASE ASSAYS IN DETECTION OF INSULIN-ANTIBODIES INFLUENCE OF IODINATION SITE ON LABELED INSULIN BINDING, Journal of immunological methods, 169(2), 1994, pp. 241-249
On type 1 newly diagnosed and on insulin treated diabetic patients, an
ti-insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and antibodies (IA) having the same sp
ecificity are respectively induced. Such immune response may be evalua
ted either by radiobinding assay (RBA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA). Both methodologies have been compared at previous Inter
national Workshops, which pointed out discrepancies in results. In thi
s work, IAA/IA prevalence was assessed by displacement RBA and ELISA,
in normal subjects, type 2 (treated with hypoglycaemic agents), insuli
n treated and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. Results showed
a lack of RBA-ELISA agreement. An attempt was then made to determine
whether such results were, at least in part, attributable to iodinatio
n site in Tyr-A(14). For this purpose parallel RBA assays were carried
out by using radiolabelled insulin at A(14) and A(19) Tyr residues. C
ontrol sera and samples from insulin treated and type 1 newly diagnose
d diabetic patients were tested. Our results suggest that labelling po
sition is not involved in artifactual binding of tracers, at least as
a systematic phenomenon. In the majority of cases the variability in R
BA-ELISA signal ratios are best explained in terms of differences in t
he basic principles operating in both methods instead of artifacts due
to tracer preparation.