M. Spivak et M. Gilliam, FACULTATIVE EXPRESSION OF HYGIENIC BEHAVIOR OF HONEY-BEES IN RELATIONTO DISEASE RESISTANCE, Journal of Apicultural Research, 32(3-4), 1993, pp. 147-157
Four experiments were conducted to examine factors that influence the
expression of hygienic and non-hygienic behaviour in honey bees, Apis
mellifera, and to examine the correlation between this behaviour and r
esistance to chalkbrood, Ascosphaera apis. Colonies were headed by ins
trumentally inseminated queens selected on the basis of uncapping and
removal behaviour expressed by their progeny. In the first experiment,
colony strength was altered by transferring hygienic and non-hygienic
colonies from 10-frame field hives to 2-frame observation hives. This
treatment significantly reduced the hygienic response of the hygienic
bees but did not affect the response of the non-hygienic bees. In the
second experiment, hygienic and non-hygienic bees displayed different
responses to freeze-killed and live brood which had been partially or
entirely uncapped. Both lines of bees recapped both partially and ent
irely uncapped live brood, but non-hygienic bees also recapped partial
ly uncapped freeze-killed brood, suggesting that non-hygienic bees eit
her could not detect dead or diseased brood or avoided it by sealing i
t within a comb cell. The third experiment tested whether the degree o
f hygienic behaviour could be increased by adding hygienic bees to non
-hygienic colonies. Adding 20-30% young hygienic bees to non-hygienic
colonies did not increase the degree of hygienic behaviour, but adding
young non-hygienic bees to hygienic colonies suppressed the behaviour
. The results suggest that although hygienic behavior is genetically d
etermined, its expression depends on colony strength and composition o
f workers within the colony. In the fourth experiment, the hygienic an
d non-hygienic colonies were fed with pollen patties containing A. api
s spores. The weak correspondence that was observed between removal be
haviour and physiological resistance to chalkbrood suggested that few
colonies are both highly hygienic and physiologically resistant to cha
lkbrood. Selection against uncapping and removing diseased brood might
occur if this behaviour also promotes the spread of disease through t
he colony. This possibility is discussed in relation to avoidance beha
viour of other social insects toward pathogens.