This study examined how a negative revelation (e.g., discovering a pre
viously unknown stigma) disrupts dyads' shared impressions of another
person; dyads attempt to revise impression by focusing on negative, st
igma-congruent information. Because some individual social cognitive p
rocesses have dyad-level analogues (e.g., transactive memory), it was
proposed that the time dyads allocate to discussing certain informatio
n mimics individual attentional processes: measures of conversation co
ntent similarly should mimic measures of individual thought processes.
In 2 experiments, dyads' impressions either were disrupted or not dis
rupted by a stigma revelation: In both experiments, compared with nond
isrupted dyads, disrupted dyads discussed congruent information longer
, discussed how it fit their impressions, and questioned each other ab
out it. Experiment 2 also showed that, after disruption, dyads increas
ed focus on congruent information over time.