RESPONSE OF FORAGE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS TO PLANTING DATE AND SILAGE PASTURE MANAGEMENT IN SPRING SEEDED WINTER CEREAL SPRING OAT CROPPING SYSTEMS/
Vs. Baron et al., RESPONSE OF FORAGE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS TO PLANTING DATE AND SILAGE PASTURE MANAGEMENT IN SPRING SEEDED WINTER CEREAL SPRING OAT CROPPING SYSTEMS/, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74(1), 1994, pp. 7-13
Spring-planted mixtures of spring and winter cereals in a silage/fall
pasture system have been shown to extend the grazing season in the Par
kland of the Canadian prairies. Experiments were conducted at Lacombe,
Alberta to determine the effects of planting date on yield and yield
components of spring-seeded spring oat (Avena sativa L.), winter wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.), winter triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) a
nd winter rye (Secale cereale L.). The cereals were grown as monocrops
or as binary mixtures of the oat and winter cereals. Treatments were
planted in early May and mid-June and harvested twice for forage. The
initial harvest for early and late planting dates occurred when oat re
ached the early-milk and heading stages, respectively. Regrowth was ha
rvested in mid- to late September. The planting date x treatment inter
action did not affect(P < 0.05) annual yield(initial + regrowth) even
though oat was harvested at different developmental stages. Averaged o
ver treatments, late planting reduced annual yield by 42%. The annual
yields ranked: mixtures = oat monocrop > winter cereals. Late planting
date reduced the initial yield of all treatments, but the winter mono
crops were reduced less than oat. Oat dominated the initial yield of a
ll mixtures. Although oat tiller density was lower in the mixtures tha
n monocropped oat at the initial cut, oat constituted a greater propor
tion of the mixture than would have been expected from the seeding rat
io (1:1). A larger tiller weight in the oat mixture vs. the monocrop m
ay have compensated for low tiller density in the mixture. Mixture reg
rowth yields tended to be greater in late-planted treatments and were
dominated by the winter cereals. Although the winter cereal component
of the mixture had more tillers at the regrowth cut, they still had lo
wer yields when compared with their respective monocrops. Thus, late p
lanting reduced annual yields of mixtures and monocrops, but did not l
imit regrowth of winter cereals in mixtures given equal regrowth perio
ds.