J. Angst, SEVERITY OF DEPRESSION AND BENZODIAZEPINE COMEDICATION IN RELATIONSHIP TO EFFICACY OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN ACUTE TRIALS, Human psychopharmacology, 8(6), 1993, pp. 401-407
The severity of depression at baseline, measured by the 17-item Hamilt
on rating scale for depression (HAM-D), was analysed as a predictor of
the response to treatment, with response being defined as a 50 per ce
nt improvement on the HAM-D or a good/very good outcome on the clinica
l global assessment over four weeks treatment. There is a good correla
tion between the two outcome measures (r = 0.67), but the question of
the optimal outcome measure in very mild depression remains unsolved.
The meta-analysis was based on 2684 patients from a data pool of doubl
e-blind trials carried out with moclobemide compared to placebo and/or
standard antidepressants. The placebo response rate was high (40 per
cent) in very mild depression (HAM-D < 16) and low (12 per cent) in mo
derate and severe depression. The reverse was true for moclobemide and
imipramine. They showed a relatively lower response rate in cases of
very mild depression but an equally good response in mild, moderate an
d severe depression. Co-medication with benzodiazepines increases the
response to placebo treatment and decreases the power of a comparative
trial considerably. Benzodiazepines were more frequently given to pat
ients who had been pretreated with an antidepressant before entering a
n experimental trial. When analysing the outcome of antidepressant dru
g trials, it is recommended that investigators take into account pretr
eatment, co-medication and baseline severity.