AMNIOCENTESIS PERFORMED AT 14 WEEKS GESTATION OR EARLIER - COMPARISONWITH 1ST-TRIMESTER TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING

Citation
Lp. Shulman et al., AMNIOCENTESIS PERFORMED AT 14 WEEKS GESTATION OR EARLIER - COMPARISONWITH 1ST-TRIMESTER TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING, Obstetrics and gynecology, 83(4), 1994, pp. 543-548
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
83
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
543 - 548
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1994)83:4<543:APA1WG>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective: To compare our initial experiences with early amniocentesis and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Methods: We compa red the diagnostic and pregnancy outcomes of our initial 250 patients undergoing early amniocentesis (at or before the 14th completed week o f gestation) or transabdominal CVS (performed between 9.5-12.9 weeks' gestation). In both groups, the indication for prenatal diagnosis was advanced maternal age (35 years or older at estimated date of delivery ). Results: No diagnostic errors were made using either technique, and the culture failure rate for both methods was 0.8% (two of 250). Seve n cytogenetic abnormalities in the early amniocentesis group and seven in the transabdominal CVS group were detected. Nine of the 250 women undergoing early amniocentesis reported spontaneous miscarriages follo wing the procedure, compared to five in the transabdominal CVS group. The loss rates were 3.8% in the early amniocentesis group and 2.1% in the transabdominal CVS group among continuing pregnancies. Frequencies of premature delivery, small for gestational age infants, and associa ted structural defects in both groups were comparable. Conclusions: At this time, early amniocentesis cannot be assumed to be equal to conve ntional transabdominal CVS or amniocentesis with regard to safety or a ccuracy; only a large cohort randomized study will adequately determin e the safety and efficacy of early amniocentesis.