This paper presents a response to Buchanan et al.'s critique of our pr
evious paper 'Social Marketing and Communication in Health Promotion'
(Health Promotion International, 6, 135-145). It examines their commen
ts in five areas. consumer orientation, exchange, profitability, integ
rated approach and advertising. Our response takes issue with many of
the points made by Buchanan et al., and suggests that the authors have
failed to mise more legitimate and relevant questions about social ma
rketing. Ultimately, it concludes that Buchanan says nothing to alter
our original opinion that social marketing, along with other disciplin
es, does have the potential to make a useful contribution to health pr
omotion.