Jm. Olsewski et Ad. Depew, ARTHROSCOPIC SUBACROMIAL DECOMPRESSION AND ROTATOR CUFF DEBRIDEMENT FOR STAGE-II AND STAGE-III IMPINGEMENT, Arthroscopy, 10(1), 1994, pp. 61-68
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff debridement wa
s performed on 61 consecutive patients with either stage II or stage I
II impingement syndrome: 27 with no actual tear of the cuff (group IIa
); 21 with a partial-thickness tear (group IIb); and 13 with full-thic
kness tears (group III). Patients were seen in follow-up at a minimum
of 2 years (mean 27.7 months). Apical oblique and outlet radiographic
views of the shoulder were used to evaluate both preoperative subacrom
ial pathology and to document removal of adequate bone postoperatively
. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using both the UCLA
Shoulder Rating Scale and Neer's criteria. Twenty-four of the 61 case
s were compensation related. Mean motion improved postoperatively for
all stages of impingement. For all patients, preoperative UCLA and Nee
r ratings were unsatisfactory. In group IIa, postoperative UCLA and Ne
er ratings improved in 22 patients to an 81% satisfactory result rate.
In group IIb, 17 patients had major improvement in UCLA and Neer rati
ngs (also an 81% satisfactory result rate). In group III, there were 1
0 satisfactory and three unsatisfactory results for a 77% satisfactory
result rate. Of the 10 satisfactory results, eight were in patients w
ho were either retired or worked at sedentary jobs that did not demand
above-shoulder activities and strength, and whose principal preoperat
ive complaint was pain. All 10 of these patients had relief of their p
ain; the three unsatisfactory results were all compensation cases in m
anual laborers, one later having a satisfactory result from an open cu
ff repair. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff deb
ridement is effective in the treatment of stage II impingement, includ
ing partial-thickness tears, as well as in the carefully selected pati
ent with stage III disease who does not have demands of strength or re
petitive shoulder elevation and whose principal complaint is pain. Rad
iographic evaluation using both the apical oblique and outlet views of
the shoulder provides excellent documentation of preoperative subacro
mial bone pathology and postoperative bone removal.