IN-VITRO METABOLISM OF L-696,229, AN HIV-1 REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR IN RATS AND HUMANS - HEPATIC AND EXTRAHEPATIC METABOLISM AND IDENTIFICATION OF ENZYMES INVOLVED IN THE HEPATIC-METABOLISM
T. Prueksaritanont et al., IN-VITRO METABOLISM OF L-696,229, AN HIV-1 REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR IN RATS AND HUMANS - HEPATIC AND EXTRAHEPATIC METABOLISM AND IDENTIFICATION OF ENZYMES INVOLVED IN THE HEPATIC-METABOLISM, Drug metabolism and disposition, 22(2), 1994, pp. 281-288
The metabolism of L-696,229, zol-2-yl)ethyl]-5-ethyl-6-methylpyridin-2
(1H)-one, a potent human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 reverse transcr
iptase inhibitor, by rat liver, lung, gut, and kidney microsomes has b
een studied. L-696,229 was metabolized by rat liver microsomes to seve
ral products: the 5 alpha-hydroxyethyl (M1); 5,6-dihydrodiol (M2); 6'-
hydroxy (M3); 6-hydroxymethyl (M4); and 5-vinyl (M5) metabolites. For
these pathways, liver was the most active metabolizing organ, whereas
lung was the major extrahepatic organ in the drug metabolism. In all t
issues tested, M1 was the major metabolite. With the exception of M3,
gender differences in the hepatic formation of all metabolites were ob
served. Enzymes responsible for the hepatic metabolism of L-696,229 in
rats were also investigated using various enzyme inducers and polyclo
nal antibodies to rat P-450. Treatment of male rats with dexamethasone
(DX) or phenobarbital (PB) caused significant increases in the hepati
c formation of the gender-dependent metabolites. Methylcholanthrene (3
-MC) greatly enhanced the hepatic formation of M1, M3, and M4. Immunoi
nhibition studies suggested that CYP2B1/2 and 2E1 were not involved in
L-696,229 metabolism, whereas CYP1A was partly responsible for the fo
rmation of M1 in untreated rats. CYP3A played an important role in the
formation of M1, M2, M4, and M5 in untreated and DX-treated rats. In
PB-treated rats, CYP2B1/2 was involved in the increased formation of M
1 and M4, whereas CYP3A was partly involved in the enhanced M2 and M4
formation, and primarily responsible for the increased M5 formation. I
n 3-MC-treated rats, CYP1A played a major role in the induction of M1,
M3, and M4 formation, whereas CYP3A was an important enzyme for M5 fo
rmation. The formation of M1 was stereoselective, with CYP1A preferent
ially catalyzed the formation of the (-)-enantiomer, whereas CYP3A and
CYP2B1/2 favored the formation of the (+)-enantiomer. The metabolism
of L-696,229 by human liver microsomes was qualitatively and quantitat
ively similar to that observed by rat liver microsomes. As previously
found with rat microsomes, antirat CYP3A significantly inhibited the f
ormation of all metabolites in human microsomes, with the exception of
M3. A microsomal product prepared from human lymphoblast cells transf
ected with a cDNA encoding CYP3A4 showed significant formation of thes
e diminished metabolites, further supporting the important role of CYP
3A subfamily in L-696,229 metabolism in humans.