DIFFERENTIAL INTERACTION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI HEAT-LABILE TOXIN AND CHOLERA-TOXIN WITH PIG INTESTINAL BRUSH-BORDER GLYCOPROTEINS DEPENDING ON THEIR ABH AND RELATED BLOOD-GROUP ANTIGENIC DETERMINANTS
Le. Balanzino et al., DIFFERENTIAL INTERACTION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI HEAT-LABILE TOXIN AND CHOLERA-TOXIN WITH PIG INTESTINAL BRUSH-BORDER GLYCOPROTEINS DEPENDING ON THEIR ABH AND RELATED BLOOD-GROUP ANTIGENIC DETERMINANTS, Infection and immunity, 62(4), 1994, pp. 1460-1464
The ability of glycoproteins from pig intestinal brush border membrane
s (BBM) to bind cholera toxin (CT) or heat-labile toxins from strains
of Escherichia coli isolated from human (LTh) or pig (LTp) intestines
was studied. Glycoproteins capable of binding the toxins are also reco
gnized by antibodies or lectins specific for ABO(H) blood group and re
lated antigens. Pigs expressing A, H, or I antigenic determinants were
used for comparison. The toxin-binding capacity of a glycoprotein dep
ends on the toxin type and the blood group epitope borne by the glycop
rotein. LTh and LTp preferably bound to several blood group A-active g
lycoproteins rather than II-active glycoproteins. By contrast, CT prac
tically did not recognize either blood group A- or blood group II-acti
ve glycoproteins, while glycoproteins from pigs expressing I antigenic
determinants were able to interact with LTh, LTp, and CT. LTh, LTp, o
r CT glycoprotein binding was selectively inhibited by specific lectin
s or monosaccharides. Affinity purification of the toxin binding brush
border glycoproteins on the basis of their blood group reactivity sug
gests that such glycoproteins are hydrolytic enzymes. BBM from A(+) pi
gs contain about 27 times more LTh binding sites, in addition to those
recognized by CT, than an equivalent membrane preparation from HC pig
s. The present findings may help clarify some previous unclear results
on LTh binding to intestinal BBM glycoproteins obtained by use of ani
mals not typed by their ABO(H) blood group phenotype.