Gj. Meijer et al., A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF FLEXIBLE (POLYACTIVE(R)) VERSUS RIGID (HYDROXYLAPATITE) PERMUCOSAL DENTAL IMPLANTS .1. CLINICAL ASPECTS, Journal of oral rehabilitation, 24(2), 1997, pp. 85-92
Recently, an elastomeric polyethyleneoxide polybutylene-terephthalate
(PEO:PBT) copolymer (Polyactive(R)) was introduced, which exhibits bon
e-bonding characteristics. In contrast to ceramics, bioglass, titanium
and other metals, PEO:PBT copolymers are flexible materials that coul
d reduce undesirable peak stresses along the neck of a permucosal impl
ant. The application of three types of Polyactive(R) permucosal dental
implants (one dense and two porous types) and one dense hydroxylapati
te (HA) implant were clinically tested and compared during 30 weeks of
loading in a dog experiment. With respect to the porous Polyactive(R)
implants, it was observed that the pore diameter had decreased to suc
h an extent that optimal bone ingrowth was not achieved. Polyactive(R)
is known to expand due to water uptake, and, as a consequence, the si
zes of the pores of the press-fit inserted implants had decreased to a
large extent. This feature explained the high loss of the implants wi
th the porous outer layer (6 out of 22). None of the dense Polyactive(
R) implants and only one of the HA implants were lost. Statistical ana
lysis was performed solely on the dense Polyactive(R) and the HA impla
nts. At the lingual sites, plaque scores, gingiva indices, bleeding in
dices and corresponding pocket depths were statistically significantly
lower for both implant types, when compared to the corresponding valu
es at the buccal, mesial and distal sites, irrespective of the observa
tion period. Differences between the dense Polyactive(R) and the HA im
plants were not observed. A considerable difference in mobility was re
gistered between the Polyactive(R) and the hydroxylapatite implants, a
s measured by the Periotest(R). The dense Polyactive(R) implants funct
ioned adequately and had mobility resembling natural teeth. As such, t
hese dense flexible materials showed a favourable clinical function an
d they seem promising for reducing undesired peak stresses when applie
d as a dental implant.