INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF PERIOPERATIVE HISTAMINE-RELEASE - RANDOMIZED STUDY OF VOLUME LOADING AND ANTIHISTAMINES AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA
W. Lorenz et al., INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF PERIOPERATIVE HISTAMINE-RELEASE - RANDOMIZED STUDY OF VOLUME LOADING AND ANTIHISTAMINES AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA, Lancet, 343(8903), 1994, pp. 933-940
Although histamine release is recognised as a common event during anae
sthesia and surgery, few clinicians judge the resultant cardiorespirat
ory disturbances serious enough to warrant prophylaxis with antihistam
ines. We have assessed the incidence and importance of histamine relea
se in a randomised 2 x 2 factorial study. 240 patients representing a
routine throughput of major general surgery were studied during a stan
dardised induction of anaesthesia and preoperative loading of the circ
ulation with either Ringer solution or Haemaccel-35, with or without a
ntihistamine prophylaxis with dimetindene (H-1) plus cimetidine (H-2).
Cardiorespiratory disturbances were graded as detectable, clinically
relevant, or life-threatening from observers' records of the anaesthes
ia and the actions taken by the anaesthetists. Disturbances that were
accompanied by significant rises in plasma histamine were further desi
gnated histamine-related, and those that were not were designated hist
amine-unrelated. Anaesthetists, observers, and designators were blinde
d to whether or not the patients had received antihistamines and to wh
ich solution was used for circulatory volume loading. Clinically relev
ant or life-threatening histamine-related disturbances occurred in 8%
of the patients who after induction of anaesthesia received Ringer wit
hout antihistamines, in 26% of those who received Haemaccel without an
tihistamines, and in 2% or less of those who received antihistamines (
p less-than-or-equal-to .0001). There were 4 life-threatening histamin
e-related disturbances, all in patients who received Haemaccel without
antihistamines (p<0.01). Histamine-unrelated disturbances occurred in
16% overall, with no obvious effect of Haemaccel or antihistamines.Th
e histamine-related disturbances under anaesthesia were remarkable for
their severity (even with small rises in histamine concentrations), f
or the prevalence of bradycardia, and for the absence of skin signs. T
heir likelihood and severity were increased in patients with tumours.
The results of the trial make a case for routine prophylaxis with anti
histamines as part of anaesthetic management.