Pb. Vermeulen et al., INFLUENCE OF INVESTIGATOR EXPERIENCE AND MICROSCOPIC FIELD SIZE ON MICROVESSEL DENSITY IN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CARCINOMA, Breast cancer research and treatment, 42(2), 1997, pp. 165-172
In this study on the determination of intratumoral microvessel density
(MVD) in breast cancer, we have investigated the influence of the obs
erver experience and the microscopic field size. We have used the samp
le set reported on earlier in the J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 1797-1798, 19
95. This case-control study has shown a positive association of high M
VD and unfavorable outcome when comparing node-negative pT1-2 breast c
arcinoma (NNBC) patients with a disease-free period of over ten years
with those with an early distant relapse. Tumor sections of both outco
me groups (favorable: n = 19; unfavorable: n = 19) were immunostained
for factor VIII related-antigen (FVIII r-Ag). Microvessels were counte
d in the areas of most intense vascularization ('hot spots'), both at
magnification x 200 (field size of 0.61 square mm) and x 400 (field si
ze of 0.15 square mm), by one inexperienced and three experienced obse
rvers. Microphotographs of individual vascular hot spots were analyzed
using overlays resembling the two field sizes. The main results obtai
ned are: i) a confirmation of the prognostic value of microvessel dens
ity in the case-control sample set (n = 38) was established by all exp
erienced but not by the unexperienced investigator; ii) both at x 200
and x 400 magnification, angiogenesis quantification in vascular hot s
pots contained prognostic information. The results of this study indic
ate that the selection of vascular hot spots in tumor sections immunos
tained for an antigen expressed on endothelial cells is more prone to
inter-observer variability and more dependent on training than the cou
nting of the microvessels within predefined hot spots itself. The micr
oscopic magnification and resulting field size do not influence the pr
ognostic significance of MVD in NNBC. This information validates the d
evelopment of more objective methods of measuring the amount of angiog
enesis within malignant tissue. This will allow more accurate implemen
tation of the angiogenesis parameter in multiparametric and prospectiv
e prognostic factor studies in NNBC.