Ma. Ashburn et al., RESPIRATORY-RELATED CRITICAL EVENTS WITH INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA, The Clinical journal of pain, 10(1), 1994, pp. 52-56
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the underlying
causes of respiratory-related critical events associated with intraven
ous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA). Design: The design is an ob
servation study of prospectively collected data. Setting: An Acute Pai
n Service (APS) was established for the management of all patients rec
eiving IV PCA therapy for pain management. As part of ongoing care, al
l respiratory-related critical events were documented and analyzed by
staff members of the APS team. Patients: All patients receiving IV PCA
therapy through the APS during the period of May 1990 through October
1992 were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Evaluation of all res
piratory-related critical events was attempted to identify the underly
ing cause of the event and to determine if measures could be taken to
prevent recurrence of similar events. Outcome Measures: Any clinical e
vent that could have or did lead to adverse patient outcome was used a
s an outcome measure. Results: A total of 3,785 patients received PCA
therapy for a total of 11,521 patient care days. Fourteen critical eve
nts occurred, of which four led to increased patient care. There were
eight programming errors (all involving misprogramming of the continuo
us infusion): three involved a family member activating the device, th
ree were the result of an error in clinical judgment, and one involved
a patient tampering with the device (one event involved more than one
error). Of the four events that led to increased patient care, two in
volved a family member activating the device, one was the result of a
programming error, and one was the result of an error in clinical judg
ment. All patients who experienced a critical event had an uneventful
recovery. Conclusions: Following review of the critical events, it was
determined that the design of the PCA device contributed to the mispr
ogramming errors and the device was removed from service. Changes in t
he training of physicians and nurses were instituted to avoid recurren
ce of other errors identified. The incidence of serious respiratory-re
lated critical events was 0.1%. IV PCA therapy has the risk of potenti
ally serious complications and requires constant physician and nursing
care with an active quality assurance program.