EFFECT OF ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION OF FLUCONAZOLE ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN FLUCONAZOLE AND MIDAZOLAM

Citation
J. Ahonen et al., EFFECT OF ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION OF FLUCONAZOLE ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN FLUCONAZOLE AND MIDAZOLAM, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 51(5), 1997, pp. 415-419
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
00316970
Volume
51
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
415 - 419
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-6970(1997)51:5<415:EOROAO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective: Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine hypnotic extensi vely metabolized by CYP3A4 enzyme. Orally ingested azole antimycotics, including fluconazole, interfere with the metabolism of oral midazola m during its absorption and elimination phases. We compared the effect of oral and intravenous fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharm acodynamics of orally ingested midazolam. Methods: A double-dummy, ran domized, cross-over study in three phases was performed in 9 healthy v olunteers. The subjects were given orally fluconazole 400 mg and intra venously saline within 60 min; orally placebo and intravenously flucon azole 400 mg; and orally placebo and intravenously saline. An oral dos e of 7.5 mg midazolam was ingested 60 min after oral intake of flucona zole/placebo, i.e. at the end of the corresponding infusion. Plasma co ncentrations of midazolam, alpha-hydroxymidazolam and fluconazole were determined and pharmacodynamic effects were measured up to 17 h. Resu lts: Both oral and intravenous fluconazole significantly increased the area under the midazolam plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-3), A UC(0-17)) 2- to 3-fold, the elimination half-life of midazolam 2.5-fol d and its peak concentration (C-max) 2- to 2.5-fold compared with plac ebo. The AUC(0-3) and the C-max of midazolam were significantly higher after oral than after intravenous administration of fluconazole. Both oral and intravenous fluconazole increased the pharmacodynamic effect s of midazolam but no differences were detected between the fluconazol e phases. Conclusion: We conclude that the metabolism of orally admini stered midazolam was more strongly inhibited by oral than by intraveno us administration of fluconazole.