Prior to the use of lithotripsy techniques, there was no requirement f
or a vocabulary to describe the relative breakability of a urinary cal
culus. With the introduction of lithotripsy, we became aware that calc
uli of different radiologic appearances or chemical compositions varie
d in their susceptibility to fragmentation. Because all truly new dist
inctions require new expressions to characterize them, we had to creat
e a term to express this new distinction, and the term we chose was ''
stone fragility.'' Currently, if we see a 1-cm calcium oxalate dihydra
te stone, we say it appears fragile (''easily broken,'' from the Latin
frangere, ''to break'', but if we see a dense brushite or a cystine s
tone, we can describe it only in terms of fragile; i.e., ''not fragile
'' or, incorrectly, ''hard'': an antonym for ''fragile'' does not exis
t. In the interest of common understanding and more accurate quantitat
ion of stone breakability, a neologism is suggested that has an approp
riate Latin root, is easily spoken, sounds authentic, and is useful. I
t is proposed that, in the interest of accuracy and as a reflection of
our greater sophistication regarding stone breakability, we use the L
atin root dur (hard, difficult) and a suffix ile (of, like, pertaining
to) to create the terms ''durile'' (adj; pertaining to or capable of
being difficult to break) and ''durility'' (noun; a quality of being d
ifficult to break or fragment).