Jf. Bugge et Es. Stokke, ANGIOTENSIN-II AND RENAL PROSTAGLANDIN RELEASE IN THE DOG - INTERACTIONS IN CONTROLLING RENAL BLOOD-FLOW AND GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 150(4), 1994, pp. 431-440
The relationship between angiotensin II and renal prostaglandins, and
their interactions in controlling renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerula
r filtration rate (GFR) were investigated in 18 anaesthetized dogs wit
h acutely denervated kidneys. Intrarenal angiotensin II infusion incre
ased renal PGE, release (veno-arterial concentration difference times
renal plasma flow) from 1.7 +/- 0.9 to 9.1 +/- 0.4 and 6-keto-PGF(1) a
lpha release from 0.1 +/- 0.1 to 5.3 +/- 2.1 pmol min(-1). An angioten
sin II induced reduction in RBF of 20% did not measurably change GFR w
hereas a 30% reduction reduced GFR by 18+/-8%. Blockade of prostagland
in synthesis approximately doubled the vasoconstrictory action of angi
otensin II, and all reductions in RBF were accompanied by parallel red
uctions in GFR. When prostaglandin release was stimulated by infusion
of arachidonic acid (46.8 +/- 13.3 and 15.9 +/- 5.4 pmol min(-1) for P
GE(2), and 6-keto-PGF(1) alpha, respectively), angiotensin II did not
change prostaglandin release, but had similar effects on the relations
hip between RBF and GFR as during control. In an ureteral occlusion mo
del with stopped glomerular filtration measurements of ureteral pressu
re and intrarenal venous pressure permitted calculations of afferent a
nd efferent vascular resistances. Until RBF was reduced by 25-30% angi
otensin II increased both afferent and efferent resistances almost equ
ally, keeping the ureteral pressure constant. At greater reductions in
RBF, afferent resistance increased more than the efferent leading to
reductions in ureteral pressure. This pattern was not changed by block
ade of prostaglandin synthesis indicating no influence of prostaglandi
ns on the distribution of afferent and efferent Vascular resistances d
uring angiotensin II infusion. In this ureteral occlusion model glomer
ular effects of angiotensin II mill not be detected, and it might well
be that the shift from an effect predominantly on RBF to a combined e
ffect on both RBF and GFR induced by inhibition of prostaglandin synth
esis is located to the glomerulus. We therefore postulate that renal p
rostaglandins attenuate the effects of angiotensin II on glomerular su
rface area and the filtration barrier, and not on the afferent arterio
les as previously suggested.