PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CLINICAL HISTORY AND ELECTROCARDIOGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK OR MINOR ISCHEMIC STROKE FOR SUBSEQUENT CARDIAC AND CEREBRAL ISCHEMIC EVENTS
Gam. Pop et al., PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CLINICAL HISTORY AND ELECTROCARDIOGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK OR MINOR ISCHEMIC STROKE FOR SUBSEQUENT CARDIAC AND CEREBRAL ISCHEMIC EVENTS, Archives of neurology, 51(4), 1994, pp. 333-341
Objective: Patients with cerebral ischemia have a high mortality rate.
The most common cause of death is myocardial infarction. We attempted
to identify risk factors for subsequent cardiac events in patients wi
th cerebral ischemia by means of the history and electrocardiography p
erformed with the patient at rest. Design: The original inception coho
rt was entered in a multicenter randomized clinical trial (30 or 283 m
g/d of aspirin) and followed up prospectively for a mean period of 2.6
years. Setting: Patients were admitted to the hospital or seen in out
patient clinics.Patients: Patients with one or more transient ischemic
attacks (symptoms completely reversible within 24 hours) and patients
with minor ischemic stroke (symptoms persisting for longer than 24 ho
urs) were randomized, provided they were independent in most activitie
s of daily living. Patients with a definite or probable source of embo
lism in the heart were excluded. A total of 3021 patients were include
d in the study. Follow-up was performed at 4-month intervals. Main Out
come Measures: Primary cardiac outcome events were defined as nonfatal
myocardial infarction and cardiac death. Cardiac death included sudde
n death, fatal myocardial infarction, or death due to congestive heart
failure; 189 patients suffered a cardiac death-82 of which were sudde
n deaths-or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Results: By means of multi
variate analysis, the following independent predictors for cardiac eve
nts were identified (hazards ratio/95% confidence limits): age older t
han 65 years (1.6/1.2 to 2.2), male sex (1.5/1.1 to 2.1), angina pecto
ris (1.5/1.0 to 2.3), diabetes (1.6/1.1 to 2.5), anterior infarction n
oted on electrocardiography (1.7/1.1 to 2.7), inverted T wave noted on
the electrocardiogram (1.6/1.1 to 2.4), and left ventricular hypertro
phy noted on electrocardiography (3.2/2.0 to 4.9). Conclusions: The hi
story and the electrocardiogram obtained with the patient at rest are
valuable tools for cardiac risk assessment in patients with recent cer
ebral ischemia.