VISUAL OUTCOME AFTER LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION THE INFLUENCE OF INITIAL LESION SIZE AND INITIAL VISUAL-ACUITY

Citation
Mg. Maguire et al., VISUAL OUTCOME AFTER LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION THE INFLUENCE OF INITIAL LESION SIZE AND INITIAL VISUAL-ACUITY, Archives of ophthalmology, 112(4), 1994, pp. 480-488
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00039950
Volume
112
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
480 - 488
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9950(1994)112:4<480:VOALPF>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objective: To provide detailed information specific to the initial vis ual acuity and initial lesion size on the outcome of patients with sub foveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related mac ular degeneration. Design and Patients: The 189 eyes assigned to laser photocoagulation and the 184 eyes assigned to observation in the Subf oveal New CNV Study were divided into nine subgroups based on initial visual acuity and initial lesion size. Main Outcome Measures: The patt ern of visual acuity loss for both treated and untreated eyes through 4 years of follow-up was compared among the subgroups. Reading speed a nd contrast thresholds also were examined. Results: Four patterns (A, B, C, D) of visual acuity loss in treated eyes relative to untreated e yes were identified. Eyes in group A (small lesion and moderate or poo r initial visual acuity or medium lesion and poor visual acuity) had t he best visual outcome with treatment; treated eyes were better throug hout follow-up. Eyes in group B (small lesion and good initial visual acuity or medium lesion and moderate or good visual acuity) had substa ntial treatment benefit by 12 months, but were worse immediately after treatment. Eyes in group C (large lesion and poor initial visual acui ty) had a small treatment benefit throughout follow-up. Eyes in group D (large lesion and moderate or good visual acuity) had the worst visu al outcome with treatment; treated eyes were substantially worse for t he first 18 months and were not appreciably better through 4 years of follow-up. Conclusions: Recommendations for treatment of subfoveal CNV should take account of the initial visual acuity and lesion size. Eye s in group D are poor candidates for laser treatment.