The view that nations compete against each other like big corporations
has become pervasive among Western elites-many of whom are in the Cli
nton administration. As a practical matter, however, the doctrine of '
'competitiveness'' is flatly wrong. The world's leading nations are no
t, to any important degree, in economic competition with each other. N
or can their major economic woes be attributed to ''losing'' on world
markets. This is particularly true in the case of the United States. Y
et Clinton's theorists of competitiveness-from Laura D'Andrea Tyson to
Robert Reich to Ira Magaziner-make seemingly sophisticated arguments,
most of which are supported by careless arithmetic and sloppy researc
h. Competitiveness is a seductive idea, promising easy answers to comp
lex problems. But the result of this obsession is misallocated resourc
es, trade frictions and bad domestic economic policies.