Ns. Hardt et al., PLOIDY RESULTS IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA VARY WITH SAMPLING METHOD AND WITH CYTOMETRIC TECHNIQUE, Modern pathology, 7(1), 1994, pp. 44-48
To evaluate the effect of sampling method and cytometric method on DNA
ploidy results, a comparison study was performed on 20 whole prostate
glands removed at prostatectomy. Fresh sampling was by sampling fine-
needle aspiration (FNA). Paraffin sampling was by microdissection and
re-embedding of 3 to 13 (average 6) 5-mm foci of microscopically prove
n tumor. Analysis was by flow cytometry and by image cytometry (micros
copically guided). In tumor negative cases, flow and image cytometry o
f the FNA was diploid in each case, and flow cytometry of paraffin-emb
edded tissue was diploid in 5/6 cases. In tumor positive cases, non-di
ploid tumor was detected by image cytometry of the PNA in 70%, by flow
cytometry of the FNA in 29%, and by flow cytometry of paraffin-extrac
ted nuclei in 21%. The most effective combination was sampling fine-ne
edle aspiration and image analysis.