IMPACT OF LIGHT-PULSES ON 6-SULPHATOXYMELATONIN RHYTHMS IN RATS

Citation
Dj. Kennaway et Sa. Rowe, IMPACT OF LIGHT-PULSES ON 6-SULPHATOXYMELATONIN RHYTHMS IN RATS, Journal of pineal research, 16(2), 1994, pp. 65-72
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Endocrynology & Metabolism","Anatomy & Morphology
Journal title
ISSN journal
07423098
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
65 - 72
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-3098(1994)16:2<65:IOLO6R>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The acute and residual entraining effects of a 15 min pulse of light o n rat pineal function in individual animals were investigated using th e excretion rate of the melatonin metabolite, 6-sulphatoxymelatonin, a s an index of melatonin production. In animals maintained in a 12-hr L :12-hr D photoperiod (lights off 1800), 15 min light exposure at 2000 had no significant effect on the metabolite rhythm. Light pulses at 22 00 (i.e., after the onset of excretion) decreased the melatonin metabo lite excretion rate for 3 hr, after which the excretion rate increased to normal. In contrast, pulses at 2400 and 0200 suppressed 6-sulphato xymelatonin for the rest of the night such that total excretion was 58 +/- 8% and 66 +/- 6% of the amount excreted on the night before the p ulse. A light pulse at 0400 had no significant effect on the 6-sulphat oxymelatonin excretion when compared with the first night collection. When the 6-sulphatoxymelatonin rhythm was assessed on the night follow ing light guises at 2000 and 0400, the onset of metabolite excretion w as unaffected (0.2 +/- 0.75-hr advance and 0.75 +/- 0.15-hr delay, res pectively). In contrast, pulses at 2200, 2400, and 0200 resulted in si gnificant delays in the onset of 2.4 +/- 0.2-hr, 1.5 +/- 0.1-hr, and 2 .1 +/- 0.3-hr, respectively (P < 0.05). The offset of metabolite excre tion was not significantly affected by a prior light pulse, except in animals receiving light treatment at 0400 when the offset was advanced by 1.5 +/- 0.3 hr. In an associated experiment, the effect of constan t darkness during the day after a 2200 light pulse was compared with o ur standard condition of light exposure from 0900 to 1800. The phase d elay provoked by the light pulse was similar in both conditions (2.9 /- 0.4 hr and 2.2 +/- 0.2 hr delays, respectively; P > 0.05). These re sults confirm the differential responsiveness of the pineal gland to l ight pulses during the night, both in terms of the acute suppression o f melatonin production and the subsequent entraining effect of the mel atonin rhythm, which had previously been assessed indirectly by seroto nin-N-acetyltransferase (NAT) determinations.