The risk of second malignancy after retinoblastoma is reported to be a
s high as 20% at 10 years after initial diagnosis. This incidence may
be an overestimate because of difficulties in distinguishing a second
malignancy from recurrent tumor. We encountered a patient with bilater
al retinoblastoma who developed a temporal mass 3.5 years after initia
l treatment for what had first been diagnosed as rhabdomyosarcoma; fur
ther study suggested that it was recurrent retinoblastoma manifesting
as primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) with multilineage differenti
ation. Chromosome 13 abnormalities were compatible with either rhabdom
yosarcoma or recurrent retinoblastoma. To determine how often second m
alignancies in retinoblastoma patients may be confused with recurrent
primary tumor, we reviewed our experience at Children's Hospital of Pi
ttsburgh. Of 43 retinoblastoma patients seen between 1951 and 1992, pr
esumed second malignancies were documented in four, including the curr
ent case. Of the three other second tumors, one had both neural and sk
eletal muscle differentiation; another was diagnosed as rhabdomyosarco
ma unclassifiable as embryonal or alveolar; the last was an osteosarco
ma. Only the osteosarcoma was clearly a second neoplasm; two and perha
ps three of the other cases may be recurrent retinoblastoma. The disti
nction between second malignancy and recurrent retinoblastoma may be d
ifficult but is worth determining, because treatment may differ, depen
ding on the correct designation. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders C
ompany.