The mortality rate for peptic ulcer bleeding has remained constant for
several decades, despite advances in surgery and intensive care, and
this has given rise to an interest in therapeutic hemostatic endoscopy
. Thus, endoscopy In the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage would be
undertaken with the aim of obtaining an early and precise diagnosis o
f the hemorrhagic lesions, to arrest active bleeding and/or to prevent
rebleeding. In the selection of patients justifying an endoscopic hem
ostatic treatment, intervene clinical criteria (age, concomitant patho
logies, current medication, hemodynamic parameters), endoscopic criter
ia (active arterial bleeding, visible vessels). The most frequently em
ployed methods are laser photocoagulation, thermal probe cauterisation
, electrocoagulation and sclerotherapy. None of these methods have gai
ned supremacy. There is consensus that sclerotherapy should be the met
hod of reference (simple and inexpensive). Endoscopic methods are capa
ble of arresting bleeding and constitute an alternative method to surg
ery in cases of emergency. They should reduce recurrence of hemorrhage
s, but nevertheless have no influence on the prognostic parameters whi
ch are essentially clinical.