PROLONGED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE AND DIFF ERENT REVERSAL EFFECTS FOLLOWING SUCCESSIVE EXPOSURE TO COMBINED VECURONIUM AND SUCCINYLCHOLINE IN A PATIENT WITH ATYPICAL PLASMA CHOLINESTERASE
U. Bissinger et G. Lenz, PROLONGED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE AND DIFF ERENT REVERSAL EFFECTS FOLLOWING SUCCESSIVE EXPOSURE TO COMBINED VECURONIUM AND SUCCINYLCHOLINE IN A PATIENT WITH ATYPICAL PLASMA CHOLINESTERASE, Anasthesist, 43(2), 1994, pp. 82-86
An 81-year-old patient had prolonged competitive neuromuscular blockad
e with train-of-four ratios of 0.1 and 0.5, respectively, after two su
ccessive anaesthesia procedures (enflurane-N20/02; vecuronium-succinyl
choline-sequence) for transurethral prostate resection. Although antag
onism with neostigmine was promptly successful after the first, 65-min
period of anaesthesia (1.5 mg vecuronium for precurarization, 100 mg
succinylcholine for intubation, 3 mg vecuronium), repetitive and chron
ologically staggered administration of neostigmine after the second, 3
0-min period of anaesthesia (1 mg vecuronium for precurarization, 100
mg succinylcholine for intubation) had hardly any effect, so that the
patient had to be ventilated mechanically for a total of 4.5 h. Labora
tory analysis revealed homozygous, atypical, plasma cholinesterase (79
0 U/1; dibucaine number 23; genotype E1(a)E1a). This retrospectively c
onfirmed a succinylcholine-induced phase II block in both instances, a
s had already been suspected following the second anaesthetic procedur
e. The degree of block transformation, and thus the available time, ar
e decisive in explaining the diverse effects of antagonism here. it mu
st be assumed that a complete phase II block developed after the first
succinylcholine exposure owing to the longer duration of anaesthesia;
the purely competitive component (train-of-four ratio 0.1) was easily
antagonized by neostigmine. At the time of the attempted antagonism a
fter the second, shorter period of anaesthesia, however, block transfo
rmation was still incomplete (train-of-four ratio 0.5). The administra
tion of neostigmine therefore rather intensified the depolarization se
gment of the mixed block, so that repeated attempts at antagonism then
inhibited any further block transformation.