Rm. Anderson et al., A COMPARISON OF GLOBAL VERSUS DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES IN PATIENTS WITH NIDDM, Diabetes care, 20(3), 1997, pp. 299-305
OBJECTIVE - This study was conducted to compare the Short Form 36 (SF-
36) (a global measure of health-related quality of life) and the Diabe
tes Care Profile (DCP) (a diabetes-specific measure of self-care and d
iabetes-related quality of life) in patients with NIDDM. RESEARCH DESI
GN AND METHODS - This study was conducted as part of a larger study in
itiated in 1991 using a randomly selected sample of communities, physi
cians, and patients with diabetes located throughout Michigan. A total
of 255 patients with NIDDM participated. The study examined the relat
ionship between the two measures and diabetes variables, such as glyco
sylated hemoglobin level and number of complications. RESULTS - The SF
-36 and the DCP have both common and discrete measurement domains. Bot
h instruments have acceptable subscale reliability The DCP has predict
ive validity regarding glycemic control, whereas the SF-36 does not. B
oth measures correlate with the number of complications for patients w
ho have NIDDM treated with insulin. CONCLUSIONS - This study suggests
that for examining relationships within diabetes, e.g., the impact of
acute complications and/or regimen on quality of life, the DCP is the
appropriate measure. Conversely, when examining relationships between
the patient's experience of living with diabetes and quality of life a
nd other chronic diseases, the SF-36 would be an appropriate measure.
Both instruments can be used to illuminate the experience and behavior
of patients living with and caring for NIDDM.