Dc. Mcgiffin et al., AN ANALYSIS OF VALVE RE-REPLACEMENT AFTER AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH BIOLOGIC DEVICES, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 113(2), 1997, pp. 311-318
Biologic valve re-replacement was examined in a series of 1343 patient
s who underwent aortic valve replacement at The Prince Charles Hospita
l, Brisbane, with a cryopreserved or 4 degrees C stored allograft valv
e or a xenograft valve, A parametric model approach was used to simult
aneously model the competing risks of death without re-replacement and
re-replacement before death, One hundred eleven patients underwent a
first re-replacement for a variety of reasons (69 patients with xenogr
aft valves, 28 patients with 4 degrees C stored allograft valves, and
14 patients with cryopreserved allograft valves), By multivariable ana
lysis younger age at operation was associated with xenograft, 4 degree
s C stored allograft, and cryopreserved allograft valve re-replacement
, However, this effect was examined in the context of longer survival
of younger patients, which increases their exposure to the risk of re-
replacement as compared with that in older patients whose decreased su
rvival reduced their probability of requiring valve re-replacement, In
patients older than 60 years at the time of aortic valve replacement,
the probability of re-replacement (for any reason) before death was s
imilar for xenografts and cryopreserved allograft valves but higher fo
r 4 degrees C stored valves, However, in patients younger than 60 year
s, the probability of re-replacement at any time during the remainder
of the life of the patient was lower with the cryopreserved allograft
valve compared with the xenograft valve and 4 degrees C stored allogra
fts.