Cw. Calomiris et Cp. Himmelberg, DIRECTED CREDIT PROGRAMS FOR AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRY - ARGUMENTS FROM THEORY AND FACT, The World Bank economic review, 1993, pp. 113-137
The motives behind government Programs to provide directed credit to a
griculture and industry can be traced to problems of asymmetric inform
ation in capital markets and, consequently, to benefits from relaxing
the constraints on financing. In agriculture, directed credit programs
that help farmers accumulate sufficient wealth to own the land they c
ultivate may improve the allocation of resources. In industry, the ben
efits of government credit may include product and factor market exter
nalities, as well as the direct benefits from relaxing borrowing const
raints. In both sectors, government credit can be useful in overcoming
obstacles faced by Private intermediaries when lending entails initia
l fixed costs that intermediaries cannot recapture. Whether government
intervention in credit markets can achieve legitimate objectives depe
nds on the mechanism chosen to implement directed credit. In some case
s influence-peddling and soft repayment constraints lead to inefficien
cies from government involvement. In other cases these problems are av
oided by establishing credible mechanisms that ensure the proper alloc
ation and repayment of funds. Evidence on industrial credit programs i
n Japan shows an apparent link between that country's success in direc
ting credit to machine-tool producers and the decisionmaking process t
hat governs the distribution of credit.